#2621 Yesterday 16:29:56

unklar

Back to the roots 1.9

From: #! BL

Registered: 2015-10-31

Posts: 2,878

Re: Show us your conky

done 

ceeslans

Member

Registered: 2015-09-30

Posts: 209

Re: Show us your conky

^An attempt.
It works well with all three. 

>snip<    https://i.postimg.cc/8fvLdY0F/20260309-17h12m51s-grim.png    >snip<
>snip<

@unklar: lately I've been searching my conky backup folder for the conkyrc that belongs to above widget (which uses rings-v1.3.1.lua, right?) but to no avail...
I'd be very grateful if you could share your conky configuration.
Thanks a lot in advance!

Sector11

Mod Squid Tpyo Knig

From: Upstairs

Registered: 2015-08-20

Posts: 8,130

Re: Show us your conky

^An attempt.
It works well with all three. 

Awesome stuff unklar.
I'm still a conky 1.9er on Debian Old Stable.
Must upgrade someday.
But it seems to me that newer these days doesn't necessarily mean better.

---

Debian 12 Beardog, SoxDog and still a Conky 1.9er

unklar

Back to the roots 1.9

From: #! BL

Registered: 2015-10-31

Posts: 2,878

Re: Show us your conky

^An attempt.
It works well with all three. 

>snip<    https://i.postimg.cc/8fvLdY0F/20260309-17h12m51s-grim.png    >snip<
>snip<

@unklar: lately I've been searching my conky backup folder for the conkyrc that belongs to above widget (which uses rings-v1.3.1.lua, right?) but to no avail...
I'd be very grateful if you could share your conky configuration.
Thanks a lot in advance!

Yes, it is v1.3.1.lua.
This is one of the Conky's that I found on the internet at some point, saved and forgot about.
I don't even know who the author is. 

You can find the files here: https://workupload.com/file/Y4k7cSbadVA

unklar

Back to the roots 1.9

From: #! BL

Registered: 2015-10-31

Posts: 2,878

Re: Show us your conky

^An attempt.
It works well with all three. 

Awesome stuff unklar.
I'm still a conky 1.9er on Debian Old Stable.
Must upgrade someday.
But it seems to me that newer these days doesn't necessarily mean better.

Yes, I know my friend...
Stick with the 1.9's. Knowing you, you would be outraged by this nonsense

  * old configuration syntax

annoy.
It doesn't correspond to the facts. 1.10 cannot handle the syntax of 1.9. It still refuses to serve.