You are not logged in.

#1 2026-05-29 07:56:49

unklar
Back to the roots 1.9
From: #! BL
Registered: 2015-10-31
Posts: 2,995

Kernel

^Because a new kernel just came in...  smile

❯ dpkg -l linux* | grep ii
ii  linux-base                                 4.12.1       all          Linux image base package
ii  linux-cpupower                             6.12.90-2    amd64        CPU power management tools for Linux
ii  linux-image-6.12.90+deb13-amd64            6.12.90-1    amd64        Linux 6.12 for 64-bit PCs (signed)
ii  linux-image-6.12.90+deb13.1-amd64          6.12.90-2    amd64        Linux 6.12 for 64-bit PCs (signed)
ii  linux-image-amd64                          6.12.90-2    amd64        Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package)
ii  linux-sysctl-defaults                      4.12.1       all          default sysctl configuration for Linux

Please update your systems regularly (nothing unusual for me at siduction every day)!

Everyone should know that AI-based security vulnerabilities have been discovered in the kernel in recent weeks.
e.g.
CVE-2026-43284 ("DirtyFrag")
CVE-2026-46333 (ssh-keysign-pwn)
CVE-2026-46300 (Fragnesia)
CVE-2026-43494 ("PinTheft")
(Probably not complete and not in the order in which they were discovered)

Currently are:

❯ curl -sL https://www.kernel.org | grep "browse" | cut -d '.' -f 2- | cut -d '"' -f 1
kernel.org/torvalds/h/v7.1-rc5
kernel.org/stable/h/v7.0.10
kernel.org/stable/h/v6.18.33
kernel.org/stable/h/v6.12.91
kernel.org/stable/h/v6.6.141
kernel.org/stable/h/v6.1.174
kernel.org/stable/h/v5.15.208
kernel.org/stable/h/v5.10.257
kernel.org/next/linux-next/h/next-20260528
❯ curl https://api.ftp-master.debian.org/madison?package=linux-image-amd64&s=experimental
[1] 3428

❯ linux-image-amd64 | 5.10.223-1        | oldoldstable               | amd64
linux-image-amd64 | 6.1.170-3         | oldstable                  | amd64
linux-image-amd64 | 6.1.172-1         | oldstable-proposed-updates | amd64
linux-image-amd64 | 6.1.174-1         | oldstable-new              | amd64
linux-image-amd64 | 6.12.86-1         | stable                     | amd64
linux-image-amd64 | 6.12.90-1~bpo12+1 | buildd-oldstable-backports | amd64
linux-image-amd64 | 6.12.90-1~bpo12+1 | oldstable-backports        | amd64
linux-image-amd64 | 6.12.90-1         | proposed-updates           | amd64
linux-image-amd64 | 6.12.90-2         | stable-new                 | amd64
linux-image-amd64 | 7.0.7-1~bpo13+1   | stable-backports           | amd64
linux-image-amd64 | 7.0.9-1           | testing                    | amd64
linux-image-amd64 | 7.0.10-1          | buildd-unstable            | amd64
linux-image-amd64 | 7.0.10-1          | unstable                   | amd64
linux-image-amd64 | 7.1~rc5-1~exp1    | experimental               | amd64

Debian fixes the kernels very reliably. I've had cases where a newly discovered vulnerability was being discussed in internet forums and Debian had already fixed the kernel for me 2 hours beforehand.
I'm really not worried about that.  big_smile  So, remember that.

Offline

#2 2026-05-29 11:48:26

Sector11
Mod Squid Tpyo Knig
From: Upstairs
Registered: 2015-08-20
Posts: 8,241

Re: Kernel

That's a huge Thank You unklar!


Debian 12 Beardog, SoxDog and still a Conky 1.9er

Offline

#3 2026-05-29 14:10:21

DeepDayze
Like sands through an hourglass...
From: In Linux Land
Registered: 2017-05-28
Posts: 1,978

Re: Kernel

Great info and it's certainly advisable to update kernels regularly, even on stable.


Real Men Use Linux

Offline

#4 2026-05-29 20:30:00

hhh
Miss Grace Jones
From: Jamaica/Paris/NY
Registered: 2015-09-17
Posts: 17,091
Website

Re: Kernel

Current debian stable is 12.90?

~ 
❯ uname -a
Linux electric-mayhem 6.12.90+deb13.1-rt-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_RT Debian 6.12.90-2 (2026-05-27) x86_64 GNU/Linux

I'm very superficial, I hate anything official. - Chrissie Hynde

Offline

#5 2026-05-30 11:33:13

unklar
Back to the roots 1.9
From: #! BL
Registered: 2015-10-31
Posts: 2,995

Re: Kernel

hhh wrote:

Current debian stable is 12.90?

~ 
❯ uname -a
Linux electric-mayhem 6.12.90+deb13.1-rt-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_RT Debian 6.12.90-2 (2026-05-27) x86_64 GNU/Linux

Yes

linux-image-amd64 | 6.12.90-2         | stable-new                 | amd64

Offline

#6 2026-05-30 16:04:27

hhh
Miss Grace Jones
From: Jamaica/Paris/NY
Registered: 2015-09-17
Posts: 17,091
Website

Re: Kernel

^ Sorry, I thought I was on sid with that uname, I was on trixie.

hhh@sid:~$ uname -a
Linux sid 7.0.10+deb14-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 7.0.10-1 (2026-05-27) x86_64 GNU/Linux

The kernel updates have been pretty steady for trixie this cycle.


I'm very superficial, I hate anything official. - Chrissie Hynde

Offline

#7 2026-05-30 17:41:34

unklar
Back to the roots 1.9
From: #! BL
Registered: 2015-10-31
Posts: 2,995

Re: Kernel

^^no problem  big_smile

The status as of today 1:41 p.m. CEST

linux-vulnerability-mitigation check
  fixed              CVE-2026-31431  "2026-04-29"  "Copy Fail"
  fixed              CVE-2026-43284  "2026-05-07"  "Dirty Frag (Part 1) / Copy Fail 2"
  mitigated          CVE-2026-43494  "2026-05-19"  "PinTheft"
  fixed              CVE-2026-43500  "2026-05-07"  "Dirty Frag (Part 2)"
  fixed              CVE-2026-46300  "2026-05-13"  "Fragnesia"
  fixed              CVE-2026-46333  "2026-05-15"  "ssh-keysign-pwn"

https://security-tracker.debian.org/tra … kage/linux

Offline

#8 2026-05-30 18:07:29

dbickin
Member
Registered: 2015-09-30
Posts: 91

Re: Kernel

unklar wrote:

^Because a new kernel just came in...  smile

❯ curl https://api.ftp-master.debian.org/madison?package=linux-image-amd64&s=experimental
[1] 3428

❯ linux-image-amd64 | 5.10.223-1        | oldoldstable               | amd64
linux-image-amd64 | 6.1.170-3         | oldstable                  | amd64
linux-image-amd64 | 6.1.172-1         | oldstable-proposed-updates | amd64
linux-image-amd64 | 6.1.174-1         | oldstable-new              | amd64

Because I don't entirely understand the process... I am running Boron, which I believe is being called oldstable now.

dbickin@bunsen-boron-sda6:~$ uname -a
Linux bunsen-boron-sda6 6.1.0-44-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.164-1 (2026-03-09) x86_64 GNU/Linux

I have noticed over the past few weeks, I would be notified that there were updates, and I have been applying them as they arrive. But if I am reading this right, I am at 6.1.164-1, but your chart suggests I should be at 6.1.17x-x.

Am I misunderstanding, or is something wrong with my system?

Thanks,
David

Offline

#9 2026-05-30 20:51:45

unklar
Back to the roots 1.9
From: #! BL
Registered: 2015-10-31
Posts: 2,995

Re: Kernel

dbickin wrote:

I have noticed over the past few weeks, I would be notified that there were updates, and I have been applying them as they arrive. But if I am reading this right, I am at 6.1.164-1, but your chart suggests I should be at 6.1.17x-x.

Am I misunderstanding, or is something wrong with my system?

Your system is probably missing the debian security source.
For comparison, this is what it looks like:

uname -a
Linux T500 6.1.0-49-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.174-1 (2026-05-26) x86_64 GNU/Linux
inxi -S
System:
  Host: T500 Kernel: 6.1.0-49-amd64 arch: x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: Openbox
    v: 3.6.1 Distro: BunsenLabs GNU/Linux 12 (Boron)
inxi -r
Repos:
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list
    1: deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
    2: deb https://deb.debian.org/debian-security bookworm-security main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
    3: deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-updates main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/bunsen.list
    1: deb https://pkg.bunsenlabs.org/debian boron main
    2: deb https://pkg.bunsenlabs.org/debian bookworm-backports main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-bookworm-backports.list
    1: deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-backports main contrib non-free non-free-firmware

Offline

#10 2026-05-31 18:10:30

dbickin
Member
Registered: 2015-09-30
Posts: 91

Re: Kernel

Strange, a few hours after I made that post another update came through and it definitely included 174-1, but today, uname still shows 164-1. Something is definitely wrong...

David

dbickin@bunsen-boron-sda6:~$ inxi -S
System:
  Host: bunsen-boron-sda6 Kernel: 6.1.0-44-amd64 arch: x86_64 bits: 64
    Desktop: Openbox v: 3.6.1 Distro: BunsenLabs GNU/Linux 12 (Boron)
dbickin@bunsen-boron-sda6:~$ inxi -r
Repos:
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list
    1: deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
    2: deb https://deb.debian.org/debian-security bookworm-security main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
    3: deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-updates main contrib non-free non-free-firmware
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/bunsen-bookworm-backports.list
    1: deb https://pkg.bunsenlabs.org/debian bookworm-backports main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/bunsen.list
    1: deb https://pkg.bunsenlabs.org/debian boron main
  Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-bookworm-backports.list
    1: deb https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-backports main contrib non-free non-free-firmware

Offline

#11 Yesterday 06:22:06

unklar
Back to the roots 1.9
From: #! BL
Registered: 2015-10-31
Posts: 2,995

Re: Kernel

^^Why don't you just show which kernels are installed on this system?

Please start a new thread and fix your grub configuration.  big_smile

Offline

#12 Yesterday 18:17:10

hhh
Miss Grace Jones
From: Jamaica/Paris/NY
Registered: 2015-09-17
Posts: 17,091
Website

Re: Kernel

^ To be fair, I have had second partition systems overwrite my debian grub and it wouldn't grub-install to the primary again unless I installed debian to the second partition.

Also, @dbickin, don't forget you need to run 'sudo update-grub' from the system that is running grub for kernel upgrades on any partition.


I'm very superficial, I hate anything official. - Chrissie Hynde

Offline

#13 Yesterday 21:53:51

dbickin
Member
Registered: 2015-09-30
Posts: 91

Re: Kernel

hhh wrote:

Also, @dbickin, don't forget you need to run 'sudo update-grub' from the system that is running grub for kernel upgrades on any partition.

Yeah, that turned out to be the problem. This was the first kernel update since I switched this system as the default. Guess I should move grub here.

But all is well on my system now.

David

Offline

#14 Yesterday 21:59:58

hhh
Miss Grace Jones
From: Jamaica/Paris/NY
Registered: 2015-09-17
Posts: 17,091
Website

Re: Kernel

Nice.


I'm very superficial, I hate anything official. - Chrissie Hynde

Offline

#15 Yesterday 22:01:04

Sector11
Mod Squid Tpyo Knig
From: Upstairs
Registered: 2015-08-20
Posts: 8,241

Re: Kernel

dbickin wrote:
hhh wrote:

Also, @dbickin, don't forget you need to run 'sudo update-grub' from the system that is running grub for kernel upgrades on any partition.

Yeah, that turned out to be the problem. This was the first kernel update since I switched this system as the default. Guess I should move grub here.

But all is well on my system now.

David

OLD ADVICE FROM THE 90's

If it's working - DON'T fix it!


Debian 12 Beardog, SoxDog and still a Conky 1.9er

Offline

#16 Yesterday 22:10:05

hhh
Miss Grace Jones
From: Jamaica/Paris/NY
Registered: 2015-09-17
Posts: 17,091
Website

Re: Kernel

Come on, be serious. Some WD-40, Duck Tape and a hammer and we'll have that Lenovo running in no time.


I'm very superficial, I hate anything official. - Chrissie Hynde

Offline

#17 Yesterday 23:58:06

Sector11
Mod Squid Tpyo Knig
From: Upstairs
Registered: 2015-08-20
Posts: 8,241

Re: Kernel

hhh wrote:

Come on, be serious. Some WD-40, Duck Tape and a hammer and we'll have that Lenovo running in no time.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Debian 12 Beardog, SoxDog and still a Conky 1.9er

Offline

#18 Today 00:56:01

hhh
Miss Grace Jones
From: Jamaica/Paris/NY
Registered: 2015-09-17
Posts: 17,091
Website

Re: Kernel

I knew you'd like that DIY.


I'm very superficial, I hate anything official. - Chrissie Hynde

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB