ISO building notes

nobody · 2017-04-29 22:00:32

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:

Posting this from the live environment, booted in UEFI mode (confirmed with `efibootmgr`) and my Windows 10 system is completely pwned with chntpw(8):

user@debian:~$ sudo chntpw -l /mnt/Windows/System32/config/SAM
chntpw version 1.00 140201, (c) Petter N Hagen
Hive </mnt/Windows/System32/config/SAM> name (from header): <\SystemRoot\System32\Config\SAM>
ROOT KEY at offset: 0x001020 * Subkey indexing type is: 686c <lh>
File size 36864 [9000] bytes, containing 7 pages (+ 1 headerpage)
Used for data: 328/29384 blocks/bytes, unused: 1/3160 blocks/bytes.

| RID -|---------- Username ------------| Admin? |- Lock? --|
| 01f4 | Administrator                  | ADMIN  | dis/lock |
| 01f7 | DefaultAccount                 |        | dis/lock |
| 03e8 | defaultuser0                   |        | dis/lock |
| 03e9 | empty                          | ADMIN  |          |
| 01f5 | Guest                          |        | dis/lock |
| 03ea | nicky                          |        |          |
| 03ec | phoebe                         |        |          |
user@debian:~$

…that'd be a thing for which full-disk encryption would be useful, no? Can Bitlocker be applied to only a partition and coexist with Linux?

Head_on_a_Stick · 2017-04-30 11:47:19

^ No idea, sorry.

I'm in the UK so I don't mess around with crypto — if the Police had my laptop and I forgot the password, I would go to jail

Anyway, I would never store anything important on a computer, that would just be silly

damo · 2017-04-30 11:59:23

Running amd64 iso in a qemu VM - nothing to report

Sector11 · 2017-04-30 18:28:51

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:

if the Police had my laptop and I forgot the password, I would go to jail

I want to believe this is a joke ... but have the horrible gut feeling that it's not.

Anyway, I would never store anything important on a computer, that would just be silly

Now that's GREAT advice!

johnraff · 2017-05-01 03:42:01

Installed CD and i386 on two laptops, and amd64 in a new lvm partition right here on the Main Machine.
Of course I haven't checked every nook and cranny, but install went smoothly, menu looks OK and bl-welcome did its thing in each case. Fingers crossed...

Sector11 · 2017-05-01 04:14:10

Gotta get my act together and grab it and install.

hhh · 2017-05-01 15:05:36

@everyone, I can't see any problems here. Recommending we release these images.

Awesome job, John!

johnraff · 2017-05-02 01:33:23

I'm going to be away (again, sorry) for 3 days from tomorrow. Back Saturday.

If you feel like making the official release during that time, please go ahead! We're already a bit late here IMO.

with the sha256 sums above to check with, can you just pull the iso files from Google Drive?
If you'd prefer I send them to you directly, please refresh my memory of the appropriate commands, but it'll have to be today or Saturday. Also, please of course rename them to fit our current naming scheme.

please be careful not to confuse the latest builds with the ones that were posted in the RC thread. In fact, I'll edit that OP and add the new iso details.

nobody · 2017-05-07 13:09:54

Is the CD-sized ISO still Non-PAE?

nobody · 2017-05-07 13:38:23

So, the release is prepared; torrents created and functional @ https://ddl.bunsenlabs.org/ddl; ISOs are named like here: https://kelaino.bunsenlabs.org/ddl/bl-D … 56sums.txt; all our 3 servers are prepared to seed the new Hydrogen refreshment.

All that remains is to announce & update the website. Tell me to update the website here; I'll do that and then you can put out the announcement.

hhh · 2017-05-07 18:55:29

nobody wrote:

Is the CD-sized ISO still Non-PAE?

Yes. I don't have time to announce today.

johnraff · 2017-05-08 06:29:26

I suppose at this point in time there's little reason to hold everything and do yet another three iso builds to take in the latest batch of Debian upgrades?
https://www.debian.org/News/2017/20170506

It would save users from some post-install upgrades, but it would be extra work for me (who both have other things to get on with). Is it worth it?

Head_on_a_Stick · 2017-05-08 07:03:46

^ the spip CVE's look nasty but they would be sorted out as soon as bl-welcome runs.

Maybe issue a reminder to upgrade the system after installation?

johnraff · 2017-05-08 08:24:03

spip isn't in the default iso package list, so users would be installing the latest version anyway.

bl-welcome gets started once automatically on the first login, and immediately proposes an upgrade, but of course users can always decline, and forget about it...

I guess the improvement of baking Debian 8.8 into the isos would be mainly cosmetic. After a while, all new installs would need post-install upgrading anyway.

Sector11 · 2017-05-08 15:25:37

I vote: Do it now, let users grab what is needed in their first update - upgrade.

hhh · 2017-05-08 19:28:02

Agreed. That's 3 yeas.

nobody · 2017-05-08 20:23:54

hhh wrote:

Agreed. That's 3 yeas.

Underwood for president!

Sector11 · 2017-05-08 20:44:53

But but ... no one will vote Underwood.

damo · 2017-05-08 20:47:13

Sector11 wrote:

But but ... no one will vote Underwood.

Not even to get rid of the nutter they have now?

Sector11 · 2017-05-08 22:29:03

Oh wait I'll vote 2,368⁶ times in that case.

Well, he did say dead people are voting, why can't Canucks? ]:D

#121 2017-04-29 22:00:32

Re: ISO building notes

#122 2017-04-30 11:47:19

Re: ISO building notes

#123 2017-04-30 11:59:23

Re: ISO building notes

#124 2017-04-30 18:28:51

Re: ISO building notes

#125 2017-05-01 03:42:01

Re: ISO building notes

#126 2017-05-01 04:14:10

Re: ISO building notes

#127 2017-05-01 15:05:36

Re: ISO building notes

#128 2017-05-02 01:33:23

Re: ISO building notes

#129 2017-05-07 13:09:54

Re: ISO building notes

#130 2017-05-07 13:38:23

Re: ISO building notes

#131 2017-05-07 18:55:29

Re: ISO building notes

#132 2017-05-08 06:29:26

Re: ISO building notes

#133 2017-05-08 07:03:46

Re: ISO building notes

#134 2017-05-08 08:24:03

Re: ISO building notes

#135 2017-05-08 15:25:37

Re: ISO building notes

#136 2017-05-08 19:28:02

Re: ISO building notes

#137 2017-05-08 20:23:54

Re: ISO building notes

#138 2017-05-08 20:44:53

Re: ISO building notes

#139 2017-05-08 20:47:13

Re: ISO building notes

#140 2017-05-08 22:29:03

Re: ISO building notes

Board footer