#81 2026-08-18 04:27:24

johnraff

nullglob

From: Nagoya, Japan

Registered: 2015-09-09

Posts: 13,446

Website

Re: AI discussions

^worth sharing.

---

...elevator in the Brain Hotel, broken down but just as well...
( a boring Japan blog (currently paused), now on Bluesky and Mastodon, there's also some GitStuff )

Introduction to the Bunsenlabs Boron Desktop

greenjeans

Member

Registered: 2025-01-18

Posts: 370

Website

Re: AI discussions

Pertinent to this subject, Debian voted on a new general resolution about AI, the winner was option #5 which basically says they neither endorse nor condemn it's use and developers are free to use it but asks that they do so responsibly. Scroll about halfway down that page for #5, and to the bottom for results.
https://www.debian.org/vote/2026/vote_002#texta
Snippet:

"Debian neither endorses nor prohibits the use of generative AI tools in the development, maintenance, or documentation of software, packaging, documentation, and other media published within the Debian Project. We recognize that such tools can substantially improve the productivity of contributors when used responsibly, allowing volunteers to spend more of their limited time on work that requires technical expertise, judgment, review, and collaboration.

The Debian Project nevertheless expects that all contributions submitted to Debian, regardless of how and with which tools they were produced, satisfy the same standards of quality, correctness, maintainability, and legal compliance. The use of a generative AI tool does not diminish the contributor's responsibility for the work they submit. Contributors are expected to understand, review, test, and, where appropriate, modify AI-assisted output before incorporating it into Debian. Blindly accepting or uploading AI-generated material without appropriate human review is inconsistent with Debian's established development practices. We encourage our contributors to disclose whether a contribution was made with AI assitance, but do not require them to do so."

Sector11

Mod Squid Tpyo Knig

From: Upstairs

Registered: 2015-08-20

Posts: 8,356

Re: AI discussions

Personally I would have preferred:

Blindly accepting or uploading AI-generated material without appropriate human review is inconsistent with Debian's established development practices. You must make a disclosure if a contribution was made with AI assistance."

But it is a good #5 regardless

---

Debian 12 Beardog, SoxDog and still a Conky 1.9er

greenjeans

Member

Registered: 2025-01-18

Posts: 370

Website

Re: AI discussions

I'm sorry, just had to do one more meme on this subject, please forgive the large image:

Sector11

Mod Squid Tpyo Knig

From: Upstairs

Registered: 2015-08-20

Posts: 8,356

Re: AI discussions

Frame #4 - can't you just see the evil thoughts in Bug's and Daffy’s heads.

LOVE IT!

---

Debian 12 Beardog, SoxDog and still a Conky 1.9er

trilobite

Member

From: Saskatchewan, Canada

Registered: 2017-06-27

Posts: 172

Re: AI discussions

I like what you wrote.

We require disclosure like this from all who write things for us. But there's no secure answer. I get sorely annoyed when the disclosure is "AI and other computer generated content may be reponsible for this content". (swearing from me now)

Personally I would have preferred:

Blindly accepting or uploading AI-generated material without appropriate human review is inconsistent with Debian's established development practices. You must make a disclosure if a contribution was made with AI assistance."

But it is a good #5 regardless

---

{Linux-using people I haven't met are friends yet to be made.}