You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
On youtube and on the internet in general, you can find many videos/articles on Wayland being the replacement for x11. Openbox relies heavily on x11 as far as I know. What are the plans of the developers of Bunsenlabs for the future?
Last edited by CooKiECruNChEr43 (Today 18:58:14)
Offline
I think the consensus among BL developers at the moment is that we'll continue to support X11 for as long as Debian does.
At the same time, we're planning a "plugin" metapackage that will allow a BL Carbon system to boot to a basic Wayland session. That should arrive before too long, but it won't be a full-featured system like X11, more like a testbench for users.
...elevator in the Brain Hotel, broken down but just as well...
( a boring Japan blog (currently paused), now on Bluesky, there's also some GitStuff )
Offline
To add to that, the problem with Wayland at the moment is that some video cards benefit from it, like my internal Intel card, while some completely struggle *nVidia*. So, X11 for this release at least. As clumsy as it is to create xorg.conf.d/20-something.conf, it still works most of the time.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AMDGPU … figuration
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Intel_ … figuration
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/NVIDIA … figuration
Also, Openbox doesn't run on Wayland, and a lot of BL users are fans of that window manager. labwc, developed by @malm and company, is a Wayland compositor that is based on Openbox...
https://github.com/labwc/labwc#readme
https://labwc.github.io/
https://forums.bunsenlabs.org/viewtopic.php?id=9639
I don't care what you do at home. Would you care to explain?
Offline
Thank you for your answer, both of you.
Offline
Pages: 1