You are not logged in.
As per title states what do you use.
I use Simple Scan, I also have XSane installed, but can t use it the way I m using Simple Scan which looks easier on my end.
Last edited by altman (2024-05-24 19:42:54)
My Linux installs are as in my music; it s on Metal
Offline
Nothing on my Linux machine. Any printing/scanning I do via my MacBook and the HP (yuk) app.
"All we are is dust in the wind, dude"
- Theodore "Ted" Logan
"Led Zeppelin didn't write tunes that everybody liked, they left that to the Bee Gees."
- Wayne Campbell
Offline
Xsane does what I need, which isn't all that much so I've never searched for a replacement.
But I'll give simple-scan a try.
BTW is it off-topic to ask what OCR software people use?
Last edited by johnraff (2024-05-25 06:12:21)
...elevator in the Brain Hotel, broken down but just as well...
( a boring Japan blog (currently paused), now on Bluesky, there's also some GitStuff )
Online
Xsane does what I need, which isn't all that much so I've never searched for a replacement.
But I'll give simple-scan a try.BTW is it off-topic to ask what OCR software people use?
Hey cool,I just find it easier, maybe that I m used to it.I think it all comes back to personal choices .
No worries about the off-topic bit @johnraff,I just wonder what s OCR (or I don t know why it stands for) ,I m a sort of no tech guy ! lol
Last edited by altman (2024-05-25 09:28:03)
My Linux installs are as in my music; it s on Metal
Offline
I just wonder what s OCR (or I don t know why it stands for)
Optical Character Recognition...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_c … ecognition
I've never used anything, but gimagereader and tesseract-ocr are in the Debian repos...
No, he can't sleep on the floor. What do you think I'm yelling for?!!!
Offline
I used to use xsane; very seldom had to scan anything. Simple scan looks interesting though.
As of now, I have an old Brother all-in-one printer that I use as a scanner. It will scan to a removable media; then I transfer to the computer.
You must unlearn what you have learned.
-- yoda
Offline
altman wrote:I just wonder what s OCR (or I don t know why it stands for)
Optical Character Recognition...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_c … ecognition
I've never used anything, but gimagereader and tesseract-ocr are in the Debian repos...
Oh, thx @hhh, I searched a bit, but it came out with something different.
Appreciated.
My Linux installs are as in my music; it s on Metal
Offline
I used to use xsane; very seldom had to scan anything. Simple scan looks interesting though.
As of now, I have an old Brother all-in-one printer that I use as a scanner. It will scan to a removable media; then I transfer to the computer.
Yep I find SimpleScan easier to use, but it might be me.
I wasn t aware that one could add a removable media to an AIO printer, it might be posible with an HP as well, never know, not that it s needed right now.
Sometime I need it in order to send paperwork for my mother or someone else.
But a bit less now with e-paperwork etc as times go by.
Last edited by altman (2024-05-25 14:54:33)
My Linux installs are as in my music; it s on Metal
Offline
altman wrote:I just wonder what s OCR (or I don t know why it stands for)
Optical Character Recognition...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_c … ecognition
I've never used anything, but gimagereader and tesseract-ocr are in the Debian repos...
I have used tesseract some in the past. It works fairly well once you found a good scanning resolution. It is not very resolution sensitive but it is possible to both underdo and overdo resolution. Yes, you can have too high resolution I found.
/Martin
"Problems worthy of attack
prove their worth by hitting back."
Piet Hein
Offline
hhh wrote:altman wrote:I just wonder what s OCR (or I don t know why it stands for)
Optical Character Recognition...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_c … ecognition
I've never used anything, but gimagereader and tesseract-ocr are in the Debian repos...
I have used tesseract some in the past. It works fairly well once you found a good scanning resolution. It is not very resolution sensitive but it is possible to both underdo and overdo resolution. Yes, you can have too high resolution I found.
/Martin
Nice site by the way, Didn t know you were into sailing. Never had one but I find boats interesting.
My Linux installs are as in my music; it s on Metal
Offline
@johnraff, It appears my conclusion from 2023 was to use a cloudy one (I was trying to get some data to check from video frames, so non-typical scenario in play).
Offline
^I tried a couple before but can't remember which one eventually worked, and even then wasn't all that great.
I'll have a look at those cloud services, thanks!
Not for any kind of private content of course...
...elevator in the Brain Hotel, broken down but just as well...
( a boring Japan blog (currently paused), now on Bluesky, there's also some GitStuff )
Online
Have not used a scanner in more years than I remember.
With Windows yes, with Linux never so at least not since 2007.
Debian 12 Beardog, SoxDog and still a Conky 1.9er
Offline
Yep, some stuff are easier on windows sadly but it s slowly getting there on Linux.
If I had it wired it would ve been way more easier , but the printer s a bit too far for a cable in order to make use of one.
The worst thing to do was to settle the wifi router to the printer(when I figured it out) with the SimpleScan app from my linux lappy(BL).
My Linux installs are as in my music; it s on Metal
Offline
I use NAPS2 - I like its simplicity.
Offline
Thx for sharing @WolfeN, never heard of that one.
Oh, that one;
https://www.naps2.com/linux-scanning
Last edited by altman (2024-06-01 10:41:15)
My Linux installs are as in my music; it s on Metal
Offline
I've been using Simplescan for the longest time and liked its simplicity as well. Can scan b&w too.
Real Men Use Linux
Offline
I use simplescan. It is the first scanning app I used and since I am familiar with it I stuck with using it.
I use Arch BTW! If it is not rolling, it is stagnant!
RebornOS, EndeavourOS, Archbang, Artix,
Linuxhub Prime, Manjaro, Void, PCLinuxOS
Offline
altman wrote:I just wonder what s OCR (or I don t know why it stands for)
Optical Character Recognition...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_c … ecognition
I've never used anything, but gimagereader and tesseract-ocr are in the Debian repos...
https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/gimagereader
https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/tesseract-ocr
@johnraff, It appears my conclusion from 2023 was to use a cloudy one (I was trying to get some data to check from video frames, so non-typical scenario in play).
I've had to play with OCR some more lately, and tried all those options.
Gimagereader sort-of worked but there were artefacts you have to remove, and words stucktogether that had to be separated. More manual post-processing than I wanted.
The cloud service Bronto discovered was excellent by comparison - hardly any errors at all. It did need some post-processing (can be automated) though, because the text came back with Windows linebreaks \r\n. Also, for whatever reason, I was unable to register for the api service - the confirmation emails didn't arrive.
At that point I discovered that the cli tesseract-ocr gives excellent results too! So no need to leave my local computer after all. Considering gimagereader is supposed to be using tesseract as a backend I don't understand why its results were so inferior. Scan your image at 300 dpi and give it to tesseract:
tesseract /path/to/image /path/to/output -dpi 300
will do it.
I'm going to post some more details of linking simplescan or xsane to tesseract in the Scripts, Tutorials & Tips section.
Here: https://forums.bunsenlabs.org/viewtopic.php?id=9164
Last edited by johnraff (2024-10-01 11:46:14)
...elevator in the Brain Hotel, broken down but just as well...
( a boring Japan blog (currently paused), now on Bluesky, there's also some GitStuff )
Online
I recently got a new epson XP-4205 printer/scanner and it was easier to setup on linux than the missus' macbook. (wireless networked). Works ootb on wayland with Xsane or simple scan but really, simple scan is too bare bones for me, but does the job. Xsane has a _tonne_ of features that mostly work pretty well even though the UX has been a dog's breakfast since forever!
#!/bin/sh
echo '#include <stdio.h>\nvoid main() { printf("Hi, bunsenlabs\\n"); return; }' > bunsen.c
gcc bunsen.c -o bunsen
./bunsen
Offline