Completely Off Topic Chat

hhh · 2020-07-24 00:54:46

glittersloth wrote:

https://cdn.someecards.com/someecards/u … -b5c4d.png

I told you! We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune!

Holy Grail wrote:

Arthur: Well I *am* king...
Man: Oh, king, eh, very nice. And 'ow'd you get that, eh?
(he reaches his destination and stops, dropping the cart)
By exploiting the workers! By 'angin' on to outdated imperialist dogma
which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society.
If there's ever going to be any progress,--
Woman: Dennis! There's some lovely filth down 'ere!
(noticing Arthur) Oh! 'Ow'd'ja do?
Arthur: How do you do, good lady. I am Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose
castle is that?
Woman: King of the 'oo?
Arthur: King of the Britons.
Woman: 'Oo are the Britons?
Arthur: Well we all are! We are all Britons! And I am your king.
Woman: I didn't know we 'ad a king! I thought we were autonomous collective.
Man: (mad) You're fooling yourself! We're living in a dictatorship! A
self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes--
Woman: There you go, bringing class into it again...
Man: That's what it's all about! If only people would--
Arthur: Please, *please*, good people, I am in haste! WHO lives in that
castle?
Woman: No one lives there.
Arthur: Then who is your lord?
Woman: We don't have a lord!
Arthur: (surprised) What??
Man: I *told* you! We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune! We're taking
turns to act as a sort of executive-officer-for-the-week--
Arthur: (uninterested) Yes...
Man: But all the decisions *of* that officer 'ave to be ratified at a
special bi-weekly meeting--
Arthur: (perturbed) Yes I see!
Man: By a simple majority, in the case of purely internal affairs--
Arthur: (mad) Be quiet!
Man: But by a two-thirds majority, in the case of more major--
Arthur: (very angry) BE QUIET! I *order* you to be quiet!
Woman: "Order", eh, 'oo does 'e think 'e is?
Arthur: I am your king!
Woman: Well I didn't vote for you!
Arthur: You don't vote for kings!
Woman: Well 'ow'd you become king then?
(holy music up)
Arthur: The Lady of the Lake-- her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite,
held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by
divine providence that I, Arthur, was to carry Excalibur. THAT is why
I am your king!
Man: (laughingly) Listen: Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords
is no basis for a system of government! Supreme executive power
derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some... farcical
aquatic ceremony!
Arthur: (yelling) BE QUIET!
Man: You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just 'cause some
watery tart threw a sword at you!!
Arthur: (coming forward and grabbing the man) Shut *UP*!
Man: I mean, if I went 'round saying I was an emperor just because some
moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away!
Arthur: (throwing the man around) Shut up, will you, SHUT UP!
Man: Aha! Now we see the violence inherent in the system!
Arthur: SHUT UP!
Man: (yelling to all the other workers) Come and see the violence inherent
in the system! HELP, HELP, I'M BEING REPRESSED!
Arthur: (letting go and walking away) Bloody PEASANT!
Man: Oh, what a giveaway! Did'j'hear that, did'j'hear that, eh? That's
what I'm on about! Did you see 'im repressing me? You saw it,
didn't you?!

ohnonot · 2020-07-24 09:40:54

glittersloth wrote:

https://cdn.someecards.com/someecards/u … -b5c4d.png

I made that part of my signature on another forum, where political discussions are allowed.
After 4 years of discussing the sense and nonsense of their current government with nerdy rednecks, what more is there to say?

johnraff · 2020-07-26 07:32:23

My ex-university just sent me an email apologizing for having having had some of their data ripped off from a computer service provider called Blackbaud. What hit me was B's comment:

Blackbaud wrote:

Because protecting our customers’ data is our top priority, we paid the cybercriminal’s demand with confirmation that the copy they removed had been destroyed.

This stuck me as totally weird, in, you're going to take a criminal's word on what they've done with your stolen data?? Discussion: https://security.stackexchange.com/ques … er-payment

glittersloth · 2020-07-26 08:14:44

^ The logic usually is; If they don't do as promised (either delete data or un-encrypt machines or whatnot), future victims won't bother paying the ransom.

.... which means that people trust cyber criminals more than ISPs or governments

johnraff · 2020-07-26 08:55:28

^But of course there's no way of knowing if they've got the data stashed away somewhere anyway. Just in case it comes in handy some day...

ohnonot · 2020-07-26 09:33:08

^^ I wouldn't want to be in Blackbaud's situation.

Playing devil's advocate for the criminal:
I'm sure they won't sell the data on immediately because they want to keep their "reputation". But I'm sure they won't delete it either: keep it for a rainy day (I'm saying essentially the same as the most-voted answer on the SX topic).

Another possibility:
The criminal asked for too little money and the company thought "what the heck, let's spend some peanuts on this, can't hurt".
OTOH, that's not how ransomware works. With ransomware, you'd have to pay for a password to decrypt your own data, not for a mere promise.

The statement describes a combination of ransomware & simple data theft; again, not sure if that's standard practice in the world of IT criminality. It actually sounds pretty exiting, how they interrupted the criminals in the middle of their attack and they "managed to get away with some of the loot"...

glittersloth · 2020-07-26 10:55:27

Need some help from anyone familiar with how Windows works.

Story: few months ago I helped someone set up a new desktop at their small office. The comp had 2 drives. One SSD (C:) for Windows+ProgramFiles+Boot+Whatever, and a second HDD (D:) for their documents and whatnot. I did that thing in File Explorer where you point/symlink all the "Quick Access" folders to specific locations locations I created in D:

Today I find out that the C: is almost full and the D: is virtually empty. The only files in D: were the ones I tested with all those months ago. Turns out this person is the type that floods the entire Desktop with their folders and documents. Like, I literally can't even make out what the wallpaper is supposed to be thanks to this mess. It's like @hhh in the music thread on drinking day.

I assume whatever this person is saving on Desktop is going into C: so how do I change that, if possible? I mean, I can relocate them manually of course, but how do I configure it so that whatever folders or documents she saves onto Desktop to go into D: in future?

Last edited by glittersloth (2020-07-26 11:41:39)

rbh · 2020-07-26 13:04:26

glittersloth wrote:

Need some help [...] I hear that in theory it's possible to move C:\Users to D:\ but given the state of Windows software I'd expect this to break random things in hilarious ways. I know that NTFS has support for symbolic links and even stuff called "Junctions"

In the old WinNT4 time, I often installd the system to an very small partition and user files / programs on second partition. The location of user directory, can be set in the registry.

Here is one simple description for window 10: https://www.easeus.com/pc-transfer/move … ws-10.html

ohnonot · 2020-07-26 17:54:24

glittersloth wrote:

...a damaged friendship and doubt in your """IT""" skills

Love the sextuple quotes!

Glittersloth, isn't it possible to shrink/expand partitions in Windows?
Basically, make D: smaller, make C: bigger?

hhh · 2020-07-26 18:36:14

glittersloth wrote:

It's like @hhh in the music thread on drinking day.

Ladies and gents, I'm working hard on it. I've been depressed a lot lately, which hasn't helped. Getting called out helps, but do it when it happens, not retroactively, please. Sloth is a friend who wants nothing but the best for me and I have thick skin, but it's still embarrassing.

Progress...

New electric fiddle and amp purchased
First time radio show achieved, Episode 9 is on the way
I still bicycle everywhere, new saddle and grips installed today before a 12 mile ride in extreme heat (for fun!)
New laptop purchased, I finished initial cinnamon tweaks today
New Sennheiser headphones and Logitech satellites/sub-woofer with internal amp for the computer/phone purchased, sounding great
BL Lithium Release in the next few days, and I've contributed quite a bit
Eating better
Drinking less
Sleeping better
Still covid-19 free (fingers crossed)
Saving money for the first time ever, I'm up to USD $3,000. Not much, but that's in 3 months with help from the US stimulus payment. I saved the entire $1200 check. Also, I have zero debt other than the upcoming months' bills (no mortgage, no car payment, and my rent is cheap)
Bored to tears with my job Dealing with my job for the time being, I'm lucky to be working at all in this US pandemic nightmare

Go hhh!

Apologies for my former spamming.

hhh · 2020-07-27 22:05:10

And I've killed Off Topic. May it Rest In Peace.

These are not the droids we're looking for. Move along. Move along.

@George Lucas, what in the actual... This is not the Star Wars I was looking for. Move along. Move along.

Crappy quality, but the original release...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=532j-186xEQ

ohnonot · 2020-07-29 19:39:55

This was under "Good News of the Day":
Nobody Likes Me. It Must be My Personality. - potus gains self-awareness.

A little later, I watched the Star Trek Episode Samaritan Snare.
I imagined a version where all the Pakleds have the face of DJ Trump

hhh · 2020-07-29 20:12:16

I like TOS. Spiner did great as Data and Stewart as Picard, but the Shatner/Nimoy/Kelley combo is hard to beat. Also, trippy set designs and lighting beat Hilton Hotel conference rooms and lighting and potted plants on any day. Twice on Sundays.

hhh · 2020-07-29 20:43:30

@schwim made a post on the main forums about spending hours on Google and rebooting to solve installing LAMP stack, to no avail.

I can relate. We all can. Linux works for 98% of the system but finding the solution or workaround to the remaining 2% can suck days out of your life.

Case in point, trying to enable SMPlayer>Options>Interface>Style>GTK on my new Buster Cinnamon desktop. Installed qt4-qtconfig, that brought up the option in the SMPlayer options menu but selecting it crashed the player and reverted it to the last style chosen. Installed qt5-style-plugins, same thing.

After over an hour, I finally found a workaround posted by @stevep A.K.A @stevepusser on the Debian forums (the Qt 4 trolltech file was fine, it was the Qt 5 export file/reboot that was needed)...

http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php? … 97#p660527

Over an hour to make the theme match. If I was a beginner, this might have taken days or weeks to figure out. I would have given up and lived with the ugliness.

Pic or it didn't happen...

https://forums.bunsenlabs.org/viewtopic … 22#p104222

deleted0 · 2020-07-29 22:56:40

ohnonot wrote:

A little later, I watched the Star Trek Episode Samaritan Snare.

Haven't watched TNG in ages. Found and watched that episode. That show hasn't aged well; stiff acting, uninspired writing. That was only the second season, hopefully it got better as it went on.

Turn the sound down and enjoy watching Marina Sirtis (Deanna Troi).

8bit

Last edited by deleted0 (2020-07-29 23:01:20)

hhh · 2020-07-30 01:21:31

She's hilarious at conventions.

One of the better Honest Trailers, TNG...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6Zc8Co2H3w

johnraff · 2020-07-30 01:39:35

hhh wrote:

...trying to enable SMPlayer>Options>Interface>Style>GTK on my new Buster Cinnamon desktop. Installed qt4-qtconfig, that brought up the option in the SMPlayer options menu but selecting it crashed the player and reverted it to the last style chosen. Installed qt5-style-plugins, same thing.
After over an hour, I finally found a workaround posted by @stevep A.K.A @stevepusser on the Debian forums (the Qt 4 trolltech file was fine, it was the Qt 5 export file/reboot that was needed)...
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php? … 97#p660527
Over an hour to make the theme match. If I was a beginner, this might have taken days or weeks to figure out. I would have given up and lived with the ugliness.

The BunsenLabs Lithium ~/.xsessionrc holds:

# for qt5 apps ( needs qt5-style-plugins and libqt5svg5 )
export QT_QPA_PLATFORMTHEME=gtk2

qt5-style-plugins and libqt5svg5 (for svg icons I think) are in the default package list.
Do we need to add stevepusser's other two lines? (That was a 2017 post.)

export QT_PLATFORMTHEME=gtk2
export QT_PLATFORM_PLUGIN=gtk2

Last edited by johnraff (2020-07-30 01:40:14)

glittersloth · 2020-07-30 13:35:37

hhh wrote:

Ladies and gents, I'm working hard on it. I've been depressed a lot lately, which hasn't helped. Getting called out helps, but do it when it happens, not retroactively, please. Sloth is a friend who wants nothing but the best for me and I have thick skin, but it's still embarrassing.

You know I was just messin, right? Sorry if it cut the wrong way. Wasn't my intention.

hhh · 2020-07-30 20:32:41

glittersloth wrote:

You know I was just messin, right? Sorry if it cut the wrong way. Wasn't my intention.

Of course. No harm, no foul. I meant to address my addiction to beer (99.9% of the alcohol I've consumed for the last decade, 0.1% vodka cocktails) and the annoyances I've caused. Writing that progress list felt very good! About 3 1/2 years ago I was homeless for ten months. I'm doing rather well now, I'd say.

Wow, apparently I'm now humble and quite British for a Damn Yank. Dammit!

hhh · 2020-07-30 23:33:42

I was wicked retahted! Now I'm getting wicked smaht!

/Boston, Good Will Hunting, etc...

#3021 2020-07-24 00:54:46

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3022 2020-07-24 09:40:54

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3023 2020-07-26 07:32:23

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3024 2020-07-26 08:14:44

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3025 2020-07-26 08:55:28

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3026 2020-07-26 09:33:08

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3027 2020-07-26 10:55:27

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3028 2020-07-26 13:04:26

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3029 2020-07-26 17:54:24

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3030 2020-07-26 18:36:14

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3031 2020-07-27 22:05:10

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3032 2020-07-29 19:39:55

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3033 2020-07-29 20:12:16

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3034 2020-07-29 20:43:30

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3035 2020-07-29 22:56:40

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3036 2020-07-30 01:21:31

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3037 2020-07-30 01:39:35

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3038 2020-07-30 13:35:37

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3039 2020-07-30 20:32:41

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

#3040 2020-07-30 23:33:42

Re: Completely Off Topic Chat

Board footer