You are not logged in.
When I use the Boron BL scripts, I get an odd response whenever it's checking the repositories:
W: Unable to read /etc/apt/sources.list.d/bunsen-bookworm-backports.list - open (13: Permission denied)
W: Unable to read /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-bookworm-backports.list - open (13: Permission denied)
Held packages:
W: Unable to read /etc/apt/sources.list.d/bunsen-bookworm-backports.list - open (13: Permission denied)
W: Unable to read /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-bookworm-backports.list - open (13: Permission denied)
When I go to actually run apt update, I get no errors: it's just when I'm running it through those BL scripts. (Like the recurring update script or the welcome one.)
Looking at my actual files in thunar, I do see that they're listed as 'unknown' instead of plain text documents, and they've got an 'x' in their icon.
(Apologies for the weird formatting, there were some graphics artifacts as I took the screenshot. Click to make bigger!)
I wonder if there's some classification that is giving the script (and thunar) worries, but not apt or synaptic themselves?
Last edited by JasonMehmel (2024-04-08 00:40:25)
Fortune favours the bold.
ThinkPad T15 Gen 2i
Offline
Those permissions look strange indeed. Could you post the output of 'ls -l /etc/apt/sources.list.d' ?
Here's mine:
john@beryllium:~$ ls -l /etc/apt/sources.list.d
total 12
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 109 Sep 20 2022 bunsen-bullseye-backports.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 122 Dec 25 2022 bunsen.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 118 Sep 20 2022 debian-bullseye-backports.list
...elevator in the Brain Hotel, broken down but just as well...
( a boring Japan blog (currently paused), now on Bluesky, there's also some GitStuff )
Offline
-rwxr-x--- 1 root root 117 Mar 21 10:21 bunsen-bookworm-backports.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 59 Mar 20 23:05 bunsen.list
-rwxr-x--- 1 root root 135 Mar 27 22:10 debian-bookworm-backports.list
That's weird. (In the terminal they're also font-coloured as executables.)
I don't know why I would have made those executable or how I would have done it when I was updating my sources in the upgrade...
Any risk in un-executable-izing them?
Fortune favours the bold.
ThinkPad T15 Gen 2i
Offline
Any risk in un-executable-izing them?
No, I think 644 should be fine.
...elevator in the Brain Hotel, broken down but just as well...
( a boring Japan blog (currently paused), now on Bluesky, there's also some GitStuff )
Offline