You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
lxqt with openbox and dmenu has always been easy - facile.
On one of three lxqt machines I went to xfwm4. It is the direction they (lxqt) are leaning towards.
But try as I might via the xfwm4 gui or looking at ~/.config/xfce4/xfconf/xfce-perchannel-xml/ and xmlcopyeditor xfwm4.xml is not the right one. xmlcopyeditor xfce4-keyboard-shortcuts.xml is what feeds into the xfwm4 gui but it is a different flavour of xml than I am used to in openbox xml
<property name="<Primary><Alt>Home" type="string" value="move_window_prev_workspace_key"/>
<property name="<Alt>F4" type="string" value="close_window_key"/>
<property name="<Primary><Shift><Alt>Left" type="string" value="move_window_left_key"/>
<property name="<Alt>F6" type="string" value="stick_window_key"/>
versus
<!--Keybind for dmenu-->
<keybind key="A-F3">
<action name="Execute">
<name>dmenu</name>
<command>dmenu_run -b</command>
</action>
that I love so much from openbox's rc.xml I suppose I should read up more on xml and types and values. Yes I have been looking at the XFCE4 pages for a few months on this, but no luck at that either.
Any help appreciated, but if this question withers on the vine here (since most aren't using xfwm4) - am O.K. with that also. Y'all are the easiest to talk to. Peace out.
Offline
Why not just use
xfce4-keyboard-settings
then add the keybinds via the "Application Shortcuts" tab?
EDIT: sorry, I misread the OP, you're using LXQt, yes?
EDIT2: I would be tempted to start up `xfsettingsd` and then apply the keybinds via the aforementioned GUI then `pkill xfsettingsd` -- the changes should "stick" afterwards 8)
Last edited by Head_on_a_Stick (2016-10-02 19:15:26)
Offline
it is a different flavour of xml than I am used to in openbox xml
<property name="<Primary><Alt>Home" type="string" value="move_window_prev_workspace_key"/> <property name="<Alt>F4" type="string" value="close_window_key"/> <property name="<Primary><Shift><Alt>Left" type="string" value="move_window_left_key"/> <property name="<Alt>F6" type="string" value="stick_window_key"/>
versus
<!--Keybind for dmenu--> <keybind key="A-F3"> <action name="Execute"> <name>dmenu</name> <command>dmenu_run -b</command> </action>
it's not so different and actually much shorter than openbox'.
the only thing is the use of characters like '<' and '>' that have to be transcribed to '<' and '>', which makes the whole thing almost unreadable.
also i wonder what a custom command execution (like your demenu example) would look like.
how is xfwm4 otherwise? does it have e.g. versatile resize options (pseudo-tiling) like openbox?
in other words, can it be considered an alternative? isn't it much heavier?
Offline
Sorry for the absence. I appreciate the replies.
how is xfwm4 otherwise? does it have e.g. versatile resize options (pseudo-tiling) like openbox?
It is supposedly to be (or is) more wayland compliant. It is the choice of the lxqt dev's. (There still is a choice in the gui between openbox and xfwm4). It does not pull down a vast number of dependencies. So I am trying it out. The documentation still could use some work. Thanks.
Offline
Pages: 1