You are not logged in.

#51 2016-01-20 07:50:26

ohnonot
...again
Registered: 2015-09-29
Posts: 4,274
Website

Re: DW comments & LibreOffice cons

tknomanzr wrote:

To me, the default package selection is such a small concern as compared to building up the correct functionality in the core system.

this.
(but most of those random screencast bloggers don't even realize that)

Offline

#52 2016-01-20 09:28:45

pvsage
Internal Affairs
Registered: 2015-09-29
Posts: 1,433

Re: DW comments & LibreOffice cons

johnraff wrote:
hhh wrote:

We've discussed package selection at length and made our compromises...

...at length for truth!!

Indeed; this discussion began almost immediately after corenominal announced that he was discontinuing CrunchBang.  As far as "major" packages are concerned (those higher-level packages like LO, Conky, etc. which everyday users tend to focus on) BunsenLabs Hydrogen is pretty much set in stone.  Any tweaks and/or potential backports that make it into the final release will most likely be behind the scenes to improve core functionality.

Also, thank you to hhh for splitting this off from the reviews thread; I should have done that much sooner. ops

Last edited by pvsage (2016-01-20 09:30:51)


Be excellent to each other, and...party on, dudes!
BunsenLabs Forum Rules
Tending and defending the Flame since 2009

Offline

#53 2016-01-20 09:32:31

Head_on_a_Stick
Member
From: London
Registered: 2015-09-29
Posts: 8,759
Website

Re: DW comments & LibreOffice cons

pvsage wrote:

Also, thank you to hhh for splitting this off from the reviews thread; I should have done that much sooner. ops

+1

Sorry all, this is kind of my fault, I was a bit out of the loop when corenominal quit ops


“Et ignotas animum dimittit in artes.” — Ovid, Metamorphoses, VIII., 18.

Forum Rules   •   How to report a problem   •   Software that rocks

Offline

#54 2016-01-20 14:10:29

hhh
Meep!
Registered: 2015-09-17
Posts: 9,030
Website

Re: DW comments & LibreOffice cons

All good!

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB